Latest from Ausiello includes Fringe info - Spoilers

Quote :

Question: Have we seen the last of Charlie on Fringe? —Kevin
Ausiello: Exec producer Jeff Pinkner isn’t ruling a comeback out. “We’ve already met Charlie’s doppelganger in the alternate reality,” he says. “He still exists.” Adds fellow e.p. J.H. Wyman: “No one ever really dies on Fringe.” BTW, Pinkner insists the exit of Kirk Acevedo’s G-man was strictly a creative decision and not a reflection on the actor himself (despite that whole Facebook debacle). “We wanted to take our team out of the FBI office and a little bit more underground,” he says, “and Charlie was a [casualty] of that.”

Question: Will we meet Olivia’s evil stepfather on Fringe this season? —Zakaria
Ausiello: “We’re talking about it,” responds Jeff Pinkner. “We definitely have been talking about that.”

Question: What happened to the new female FBI agent on Fringe? I thought she was sticking around all season. —Chris
Ausiello: According to Pinkner, Special Agent Jessup (Meghan Markle) is waiting in the wings and may pop up again in the future: “There was never any length of time [assigned to her stay],” he says. “There’s no end date. She’s an available tool in our toolbox and we’ll use her as we see fit. [But] we’re really trying to tell stories about our main characters… we want to get deeper with them, so we don’t have a lot of time to go into the FBI. I think our fans really want to get to know our [core] characters more and that’s what we’re endeavoring to do this year.”

Quote :

Question: When, if at all, will Peter realize he doesn’t belong in this dimension on Fringe? — JSL
Ausiello: I ran this query by executive producer Jeff Pinkner, who responded, “Clearly part of the tension of this season is that the audience knows more about Peter than Peter knows about himself and we will continue to play that tension.” Or, to put it in the words of Massive Dynamic’s legal division, “No comment.”

Quote :

Question: Have we seen the last of Charlie on Fringe? —Kevin
Ausiello: Exec producer Jeff Pinkner isn’t ruling a comeback out. “We’ve already met Charlie’s doppelganger in the alternate reality,” he says. “He still exists.” Adds fellow e.p. J.H. Wyman: “No one ever really dies on Fringe.” BTW, Pinkner insists the exit of Kirk Acevedo’s G-man was strictly a creative decision and not a reflection on the actor himself (despite that whole Facebook debacle). “We wanted to take our team out of the FBI office and a little bit more underground,” he says, “and Charlie was a [casualty] of that.”

Question: Will we meet Olivia’s evil stepfather on Fringe this season? —Zakaria
Ausiello: “We’re talking about it,” responds Jeff Pinkner. “We definitely have been talking about that.”

Question: What happened to the new female FBI agent on Fringe? I thought she was sticking around all season. —Chris
Ausiello: According to Pinkner, Special Agent Jessup (Meghan Markle) is waiting in the wings and may pop up again in the future: “There was never any length of time [assigned to her stay],” he says. “There’s no end date. She’s an available tool in our toolbox and we’ll use her as we see fit. [But] we’re really trying to tell stories about our main characters… we want to get deeper with them, so we don’t have a lot of time to go into the FBI. I think our fans really want to get to know our [core] characters more and that’s what we’re endeavoring to do this year.”

Quote :

I think our fans really want to get to know our [core] characters more and that’s what we’re endeavoring to do this year.

No foolin', Fearless Leader Pinkner!

That was the power quote, wasn't it? *grins*

perfect.
i can do without that useless Jessup character

I feel relieved I don't mind a new character to some extent---but I don't want her taking away from the story either.

Well, I found Jessup not so bad, after all....
but still, i'm glad she was just come-and-go character.

lezario wrote:

Well, I found Jessup not so bad, after all....
but still, i'm glad she was just come-and-go character.

no she was not so bad but still more screen time for her means less screen time for the rest of them...

I think she may be back again from time to time if they need to advance that whole religious aspect; I hope they don't. I don't think the story needs it.

Elliot wrote:

I think she may be back again from time to time if they need to advance that whole religious aspect; I hope they don't. I don't think the story needs it.

i hope tptb can hear you!!

Yes, Xeen, I'm not anti-religious, but I think that kind of storyline has been so done already, I got tired of it. Plus I think Massive Dynamic and its ilk provide enough fodder for all the conspiracies they will ever need in Fringe!

yes absolutely, my thoughts exactly

and after watching Stargate and several years of Oris, i don't want to go down that path again

Oh! I'd wiped them from my brain (the Ori)------they made me quit watching. Really dreadful end to the show for me.

Elliot wrote:

Oh! I'd wiped them from my brain (the Ori)------they made me quit watching. Really dreadful end to the show for me.

yes i cannot agree more it was painful to watch
terrible end to a once great show

Did they ever say why they made that storyline? It was just a flat, stupid, crushing end to such a wonderful show--dramatic/light/dark/humorous/serious/silly had all been balanced before...did they get new writers who should have been on anti-depressants, or something?

Xeen wrote:

Elliot wrote:

I think she may be back again from time to time if they need to advance that whole religious aspect; I hope they don't. I don't think the story needs it.

i hope tptb can hear you!!

Ugh, latest promo . . . :(

Elliot wrote:

Did they ever say why they made that storyline? It was just a flat, stupid, crushing end to such a wonderful show--dramatic/light/dark/humorous/serious/silly had all been balanced before...did they get new writers who should have been on anti-depressants, or something?

i think mallozzi took over the show for the worse

It came on here at an ungodly hour, I would set a timer to get up and watch... after the Ori came on the scene, I stayed in bed.

I'm seriously hoping they don't go too

Spoiler:

on us in Fringe. It wigged me out to hear that. I have some teensy-bit deranged

Spoiler:

in my family, and I have had all that kind of conspiracy stuff I ever need. Plus,

Spoiler:

, he writes fab books (so I hear) and let Fringe be about science.
*muffled cursing, stomping in background*

crossing fingers here, i really don't want them to go

Spoiler:

either
i agree with you here, they have to stick to

Spoiler:

i was already worried a bit when walter

Spoiler:

but i guess it was that one time and it was "in character" so to speak
i don't need to have another show ruined like they did SG

[scurrying away now]
time to go to bed

And the currently fashionable debates

Spoiler:

are based on false assumptions and not facts. I did a bit of research on that last year, it just isn't an historical fact

Spoiler:

. I hate to see Fringe fall for that gup.

----That being said, morosely, it does make me think my anagram deciphering of the tank door warning is likely correct.


(moved to the Pie section).

Elliot wrote:

And the currently fashionable debates

Spoiler:

are based on false assumptions and not facts. I did a bit of research on that last year, it just isn't an historical fact

Spoiler:

. I hate to see Fringe fall for that gup.

Elliot you're an intelligent woman ! Really !

Thank you Kreisler. *blushes*

There's a

Spoiler:

scientist who once said "when i go to my lab, I let God in the lobby".
Or something among those lines.

i do hope they stay away from

Spoiler:

I think I've read enough

Spoiler:

related words for today !